Skip to main content

Welcome to Cultural Rhetoric


Dear Eleventh Grade,

This year, we will learn to pay attention to the ways that rhetoric is used in society around us. We will see it employed in political speeches, advertisements, news bulletins, and maybe even in our churches! People try to persuade us to do or think or believe what they want in almost every area of our lives. You may even, without knowing it, use rhetorical techniques to talk to your friends or your teachers or your parents.

Rhetoric is not a bad thing, but it is important to be aware of when rhetoric is being used so that we can discern whether it is being used to manipulate us or promote truth, beauty, and goodness.

Requirements
Each quarter, you will be required to write one blog post (250-500 words) describing an instance in your life where you saw or heard rhetoric being used. Be sure to include:
  1. Where you saw/heard rhetoric used.
  2. What the speaker/advertisement wanted to persuade you to think, believe, or do.
  3. Whether their argument was reasonable. (Did it make logical sense?)
  4. Whether their rhetorical technique was effective. (Did it seem persuasive? Did you do what they wanted?)
You will send your completed assignments to my school email. If possible, please also send a link to your source. When I receive them, I will post them here. You are also required to comment on the blog posts of at least four of your classmates.

Blog Post Themes
First Quarter: Advertisement/Commercial (Due Thursday, October 5)
Second Quarter: Sermon/Chapel (Due Friday, December 8)
Third Quarter: Debate/Speech (Due Friday, March 2)
Fourth Quarter: News Broadcast/Article (Due Thursday, May 10)

I look forward to reading your cultural analyses!

Mrs. Overbey

Comments

  1. I never thought of rhetoric as a device used in church... I suppose it is very important when you preach to get your point across, huh?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I wonder if Hitler and Stalin were versed in the art of rhetoric. Food for thought...

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Weight of Glory

In Mr. Cline's class a few weeks ago. We took the day off in a way from our normal classes. Instead of continuing to read the books we were assigned and discussing them, he read us the sermon by C.S Lewis "The Weight of Glory." Its a long sermon, but one worth reading. It is about the confusion many people have on the topic of what we desire the most. He explains after much background information, that we all desire true happiness. And through that happiness, we long for heaven, our true home that we were designed for. He explains that glory is not what many people think of as being "famous" in heaven. But more that we are honored by our Lord and Father. For it to be like the scripture passage "Well done, good and faithful servant." C.S Lewis does a fantastic job at being persuasive here, and if read by the right person aloud, can have an excellent effect. He clears up lots of points that people bring up that are not true. Such as the point of glory...

Stephen Curry (Brita)

I saw this commercial for Brita water on YouTube and on T.V.  Stephen Curry, a professional basketball player that plays for the Golden State Warriors, endorses and promotes the product by saying "not all water is the same."  In this advertisement he makes Brita water seem better than the other leading brands of water by saying "You are what you drink."  He also says "some water can dribble, drain threes, or even drain a buzzer beater."  With these claims, he is implying that drinking the Brita water it could make you better at basketball and help you become better and as good as him. Brita uses a celebrity to sell it by implying that it could improve your basketball performance.  This advertisement is false because water is not going to change your skills and abilities.  It tries to persuade you to buy it because a professional basketball player drinks it.  I feel as though it may persuade some people to buy it because of Stephen Curry endorsing it....

Marilyn Monroe's Shampoo

While browsing on Google I found an old advertisement.  The ad was for Lustre-Crème Shampoo. It featured Marilyn Monroe, known for her beauteous looks and her parts in different movies. One of her movies was Gentlemen Prefer Blondes. Lustre-Crème was attempting to sell their shampoo through the use of fallacies. By saying that Marilyn Monroe that tells you nothing about the actual product: it simply attracts you to the pretty face in the picture. Using this as an argument of why someone should buy your product is quite illogical. Just because Marilyn Monroe uses it doesn’t provide assurance of its abilities. They attempt using snob appeal by trying to make the audience believe that they could be like Marilyn Monroe if they use the same product as her. They use appeal to illegitimate authority by using Marilyn Monroe to promote their product. Although she herself is a customer, this is still rather irrelevant. She herself has no type of expertise in hair products and knows nothing t...