Skip to main content

Proactiv

I saw this commercial about Proactiv+ skincare products in the Youtube. The performer in this video is Julianne Hough, a famous singer, actress. She was saying that “ I want a thing that can easily and simply make my skin stay healthy, clear and beautiful.”and she told the viewer with a happy and surprising tone that she got what she wanted in Proactiv skincare product. Then the rest of the commercial showed the people why she loves this by telling us how Julianne uses them everyday and what she felt about the products after using. According to what she said, the products are“ silky”, “very light”, not “ harsh”. So it can nourish and hydrate the skin, make the pore tiny, all these kinds of thing to compliment the function of the product. In the end, Julianne used “dream cream”, “easiest part of the day” to describe the products.

This commercial tried to make people think that, they are the best, because they are the easiest and simplest, and they they wanted people to believe, simple is alway the best thing people should think about. To achieve the goal, they commercial used the celebrity to convince people, it makes us think that even the stars use this, this must be good. And people will think they are using the same one as the star, it satisfies people’s vanity. It also persuades people by telling them the advantages after using them, that their skin will be soft and smoothy. The use of “ three steps”,”the simplest way”is persuasive, because people are always likely to be lazy, so they do not want to do any complicated stuffs to take care of their skins, this will be really helpful to them. But this commercial did not convince me that much to buy their products, since Julianne is an actress, she will use a lot of other expensive skincare products, obviously, her skin will be good even she does not use Proactiv. Even they are using ethos technique to convince people, they should still add some normal people in. But the convenience of the products actually make me want to buy it, because I am those people who are too lazy to take care of skin but still want a good skin.

Comments

  1. He described the commerical clearly. He mentioned Snob Appeal, but he did not mention about Appeal to Illegitimate Authority. By showing famous actress, the commercial tried to make people want to be like her. I think it could be effective to her fans. Otherwise, it would not be effectvie to other people.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with peter on this one, many people are to lazy to do things so they go for a simple easy way that is not always effective. Commercials are always using celebrities to persuade you, jn this case it did not work for some people because of the selectivity of her fans. But they usually work.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Good description of the commercial and quoting the commercial. It was interesting that they used snob appeal and appeal to illegitimate authority in the same commercial.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Marilyn Monroe's Shampoo

While browsing on Google I found an old advertisement.  The ad was for Lustre-Crème Shampoo. It featured Marilyn Monroe, known for her beauteous looks and her parts in different movies. One of her movies was Gentlemen Prefer Blondes. Lustre-Crème was attempting to sell their shampoo through the use of fallacies. By saying that Marilyn Monroe that tells you nothing about the actual product: it simply attracts you to the pretty face in the picture. Using this as an argument of why someone should buy your product is quite illogical. Just because Marilyn Monroe uses it doesn’t provide assurance of its abilities. They attempt using snob appeal by trying to make the audience believe that they could be like Marilyn Monroe if they use the same product as her. They use appeal to illegitimate authority by using Marilyn Monroe to promote their product. Although she herself is a customer, this is still rather irrelevant. She herself has no type of expertise in hair products and knows nothing that

Open Happiness

While at the movie theaters to see The Maze Runner , I saw a commercial that featured rhetoric. The commercial begins with a young woman named Jess purchasing two Coca Cola drinks in a convenience store. One has her own name on it, and one has the name of her friend Alisha on it. The cashier watches her forlornly as she leaves, hinting that he has a crush on his customer. Jess gives the Coke with Alisha’s name on it to her friend, and together the two friends drink them. Later, Jess, Alisha and two other friends come back into the store to buy more Coke, then leave and have a good time together. Jess keeps coming back to the store with more and more friends, each time purchasing Coca Cola with their names printed on the labels. The cashier smiles and watches, but it is clear that he wishes he was with Jess.  Finally, as the cashier is closing the store for the night, Jess shows up at the door with a Coke that has the name Chris on it. She smiles and hands the drink to the cash

Wiener Stampede

In this Heinz condiments commercial, aired during the Super Bowl this past year, a group of dachshunds are shown in hot dog costumes running towards humans in Heinz ketchup and mustard costumes who end up catching the dogs as they leap into the humans’ arms and lick their faces. This commercial is a specific appeal to pathos as the dogs are dressed up and are meant to be cute. The phrase at the end of the commercial is “it’s hard to resist great taste” and this is stated while the dogs are licking the humans implying that the dogs like Heinz and that humans should buy it as well because the cute dogs in costumes did.