Skip to main content

1 Corinthians 13

Recently I had attended a church service where the priest discussed 1 Corinthians 13. This is a very common topic of discussion when it comes to services and masses, but the priest that presented the chapter of Corinthians seemed to use many different versions of rhetoric to move his main idea across the mass’ attendance. When he first began his homily, he appealed greatly to the credibility of the Bible and used ethos to explain how God is the author and creator of all things, in which case we should therefore listen and follow this passage. The priest then went on to explain that if we do not strive follow the passage in the way that we love and act, then we would not be virtuous followers of Christ, presenting us with the bifurcation fallacy.

Near to the end of his homily, the priest began to use pathos by trying to pull at the spirits pf the audience only to uplift them. He told the congregation that if they do not always look to live in such a way as 1 Corinthians 13, they would not live a happy life. They would never be able to fulfill and reach true happiness. As soon as he successfully got this point across to the people attending the church service, he proceeded to joyously tell them that as long as they live in the word of Christ and walk by his ways, as described in 1 Corinthians 13, our lives will be full of his grace and mercy.

I will admit that the priest did an excellent job of presenting 1 Corinthians 13 as a holy and good guideline to follow, but as a student learning about fallacies and illogical arguments, I found it difficult to follow his sermon due to the amount of error within it.

Comments

  1. It would have been hard for me to find fallacies out because of excellent presentation. I never thought of these fallacies too. I like this and you are good at pointing out!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I love how you found the ethos, pathos, and logos. Also I agree with you, I find it harder to follow peoples' sermons when I catch them using fallacies. Great job!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I can understand this verse through your essay. You told what he said clearly and thoroughly. It seems to me that it did have some error in his sermon.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Well, you can't go wrong with appealing to God's credibility, so he did a good job with that. Well written, Hannah.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Marilyn Monroe's Shampoo

While browsing on Google I found an old advertisement.  The ad was for Lustre-Crème Shampoo. It featured Marilyn Monroe, known for her beauteous looks and her parts in different movies. One of her movies was Gentlemen Prefer Blondes. Lustre-Crème was attempting to sell their shampoo through the use of fallacies. By saying that Marilyn Monroe that tells you nothing about the actual product: it simply attracts you to the pretty face in the picture. Using this as an argument of why someone should buy your product is quite illogical. Just because Marilyn Monroe uses it doesn’t provide assurance of its abilities. They attempt using snob appeal by trying to make the audience believe that they could be like Marilyn Monroe if they use the same product as her. They use appeal to illegitimate authority by using Marilyn Monroe to promote their product. Although she herself is a customer, this is still rather irrelevant. She herself has no type of expertise in hair products and knows nothing that

Open Happiness

While at the movie theaters to see The Maze Runner , I saw a commercial that featured rhetoric. The commercial begins with a young woman named Jess purchasing two Coca Cola drinks in a convenience store. One has her own name on it, and one has the name of her friend Alisha on it. The cashier watches her forlornly as she leaves, hinting that he has a crush on his customer. Jess gives the Coke with Alisha’s name on it to her friend, and together the two friends drink them. Later, Jess, Alisha and two other friends come back into the store to buy more Coke, then leave and have a good time together. Jess keeps coming back to the store with more and more friends, each time purchasing Coca Cola with their names printed on the labels. The cashier smiles and watches, but it is clear that he wishes he was with Jess.  Finally, as the cashier is closing the store for the night, Jess shows up at the door with a Coke that has the name Chris on it. She smiles and hands the drink to the cash

Wiener Stampede

In this Heinz condiments commercial, aired during the Super Bowl this past year, a group of dachshunds are shown in hot dog costumes running towards humans in Heinz ketchup and mustard costumes who end up catching the dogs as they leap into the humans’ arms and lick their faces. This commercial is a specific appeal to pathos as the dogs are dressed up and are meant to be cute. The phrase at the end of the commercial is “it’s hard to resist great taste” and this is stated while the dogs are licking the humans implying that the dogs like Heinz and that humans should buy it as well because the cute dogs in costumes did.