Skip to main content

President Trump's Address to Congress


On Tuesday February 28th President Trump gave what was called the most important speech his young presidency. This speech was his Address to Congress and he used it to address the nation on what he has been working on and will be continuing to work on in the coming months. This speech was quite well received and far from Trump’s usual laughable rhetoric. His speech was much more presidential than normal and mainly stayed away from his campaign propaganda, although he did mention “Make America Great Again” one time. He very effectively used ethos, pathos, and logos in his speech and these were very easy to notice.

His speech included ethos when the politicians in the room would stand and applaud after Trump would state one of his goals. The Vice President, Mike Pence, and Speaker of the House, Paul Ryan, both made it clear that they would give a standing ovation to every point that Trump made and appear as supportive as possible. All the Republican representatives would do the same to make it look like they approve of what he was saying. Trump may not have been doing these actions personally, but they still relied on the authority of those who were standing to applaud because they know the most about what he is saying. He used pathos by bringing in a young woman with a chronic disease to support his need for a new healthcare plan. He also had the wife of a navy seal who was recently killed in battle come to his speech and gave her a round of applause. He used this to show his support for veterans and their families. His final guests were the families of people who were killed by illegal immigrants. This provided emotional support for his policy of tighter borders. He used logos by stating his policies and showing how he was working on them. This gives the viewer faith that he might know what he is doing.

I believe that this was one of President Trump’s best speeches so far. He should absolutely conduct himself in this way all the time. It made him much more respectable and although some of the Representatives did not agree with everything he said. He was still much more reasonable and he did not shove his propaganda in the faces of the viewers. This was a very refreshing change to Trump’s usual behavior.

Comments

  1. I agree, and would even say that this is still Trump's best speech to date. His effective use of rhetoric makes it clean that there are two sides to Trump. The first is his campaign side, where he says outlandish things to gain attention from the media and his more presidential side, which is scripted, as well as thought out.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Weight of Glory

In Mr. Cline's class a few weeks ago. We took the day off in a way from our normal classes. Instead of continuing to read the books we were assigned and discussing them, he read us the sermon by C.S Lewis "The Weight of Glory." Its a long sermon, but one worth reading. It is about the confusion many people have on the topic of what we desire the most. He explains after much background information, that we all desire true happiness. And through that happiness, we long for heaven, our true home that we were designed for. He explains that glory is not what many people think of as being "famous" in heaven. But more that we are honored by our Lord and Father. For it to be like the scripture passage "Well done, good and faithful servant." C.S Lewis does a fantastic job at being persuasive here, and if read by the right person aloud, can have an excellent effect. He clears up lots of points that people bring up that are not true. Such as the point of glory...

Stephen Curry (Brita)

I saw this commercial for Brita water on YouTube and on T.V.  Stephen Curry, a professional basketball player that plays for the Golden State Warriors, endorses and promotes the product by saying "not all water is the same."  In this advertisement he makes Brita water seem better than the other leading brands of water by saying "You are what you drink."  He also says "some water can dribble, drain threes, or even drain a buzzer beater."  With these claims, he is implying that drinking the Brita water it could make you better at basketball and help you become better and as good as him. Brita uses a celebrity to sell it by implying that it could improve your basketball performance.  This advertisement is false because water is not going to change your skills and abilities.  It tries to persuade you to buy it because a professional basketball player drinks it.  I feel as though it may persuade some people to buy it because of Stephen Curry endorsing it....

Marilyn Monroe's Shampoo

While browsing on Google I found an old advertisement.  The ad was for Lustre-Crème Shampoo. It featured Marilyn Monroe, known for her beauteous looks and her parts in different movies. One of her movies was Gentlemen Prefer Blondes. Lustre-Crème was attempting to sell their shampoo through the use of fallacies. By saying that Marilyn Monroe that tells you nothing about the actual product: it simply attracts you to the pretty face in the picture. Using this as an argument of why someone should buy your product is quite illogical. Just because Marilyn Monroe uses it doesn’t provide assurance of its abilities. They attempt using snob appeal by trying to make the audience believe that they could be like Marilyn Monroe if they use the same product as her. They use appeal to illegitimate authority by using Marilyn Monroe to promote their product. Although she herself is a customer, this is still rather irrelevant. She herself has no type of expertise in hair products and knows nothing t...