Skip to main content

Sandisk


One time while I was surfing the internet I came across a commercial from the company Sandisk.  It was a commercial depicting a very pretty and photogenic wedding with very happy and music in the back round.  There were many photographers taking pictures of the wedding with beautiful smiles on their faces.  Then it showed one of the photographers taking a Sandisk SD card out of the camera and putting it in their computer to show the couple their photos.  It then unfocused on the people, and a picture of their products appeared with the caption, “Free up memory, to make more memories.”
This commercial was trying to convince me(the audience) to buy their products.  There was nothing else important that they were trying to do other than for me to buy and use their product.  I think the argument presented wasn't very good, and was flawed in a few ways as well. The only thing they said was that if you buy their product, you can make memories which is not true.  People don't need to take pictures in order to create memories, they can make memories just fine with the brain that they have.  I don't think they mean this exactly as they phrased it though, they really mean “remember more of your memories”.  Even if they do mean this, they still didn't give any reasons for why someone should buy their product and not another company's.
While the commercial did in fact use an appeal to emotion(the happy wedding) and a false cause(extra space makes memories), their technique was effective.  Many people can relate to not being able to take pictures due to no more memory, including myself(something they counted on).  So, this commercial makes you want to buy a product to get more storage, but not necessarily their product.  So while the commercial was appealing, I myself am not going to buy Sandisk's products unless I need more storage or if I do more research on the quality of the product.

Comments

  1. You described the commercial very well. You said what fallacies they used; and I agree. I also think their technique was effective. Good job!

    ReplyDelete
  2. To be honest I am using Sandisk now,this is a nice blog with good describing, this is a successful commercial, nice job.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You had a good opening with telling us how you came across the add. you also did a good job with pointing out the fallacies that were used. bravo.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You did a good job at pointing out what fallacies they used.

    ReplyDelete
  5. you did really good job pointing every fallacies they used in the ad, and making your opinion about the sandisk ad ad going directly to the point i really like it "muy bueno"

    ReplyDelete
  6. I like how you explained the commercial it almost made me feel as if I was watching. I don't think their way of persuading was very effective either.

    ReplyDelete
  7. You did a great job on painting the picture, Zach! It gave me a great idea of what was going on. You also did an awesome job on pointing out what you liked about it, as well as explaining where they went wrong.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Wiener Stampede

In this Heinz condiments commercial, aired during the Super Bowl this past year, a group of dachshunds are shown in hot dog costumes running towards humans in Heinz ketchup and mustard costumes who end up catching the dogs as they leap into the humans’ arms and lick their faces. This commercial is a specific appeal to pathos as the dogs are dressed up and are meant to be cute. The phrase at the end of the commercial is “it’s hard to resist great taste” and this is stated while the dogs are licking the humans implying that the dogs like Heinz and that humans should buy it as well because the cute dogs in costumes did.

Marilyn Monroe's Shampoo

While browsing on Google I found an old advertisement.  The ad was for Lustre-Crème Shampoo. It featured Marilyn Monroe, known for her beauteous looks and her parts in different movies. One of her movies was Gentlemen Prefer Blondes. Lustre-Crème was attempting to sell their shampoo through the use of fallacies. By saying that Marilyn Monroe that tells you nothing about the actual product: it simply attracts you to the pretty face in the picture. Using this as an argument of why someone should buy your product is quite illogical. Just because Marilyn Monroe uses it doesn’t provide assurance of its abilities. They attempt using snob appeal by trying to make the audience believe that they could be like Marilyn Monroe if they use the same product as her. They use appeal to illegitimate authority by using Marilyn Monroe to promote their product. Although she herself is a customer, this is still rather irrelevant. She herself has no type of expertise in hair products and knows nothing t...

Weight of Glory

In Mr. Cline's class a few weeks ago. We took the day off in a way from our normal classes. Instead of continuing to read the books we were assigned and discussing them, he read us the sermon by C.S Lewis "The Weight of Glory." Its a long sermon, but one worth reading. It is about the confusion many people have on the topic of what we desire the most. He explains after much background information, that we all desire true happiness. And through that happiness, we long for heaven, our true home that we were designed for. He explains that glory is not what many people think of as being "famous" in heaven. But more that we are honored by our Lord and Father. For it to be like the scripture passage "Well done, good and faithful servant." C.S Lewis does a fantastic job at being persuasive here, and if read by the right person aloud, can have an excellent effect. He clears up lots of points that people bring up that are not true. Such as the point of glory...