Skip to main content

God's Masterpiece

Matthew Parker, from Church at the Mission, gave a sermon on January 19, 2016 about being God’s masterpiece. He starts his sermon with various questions about people’s likes and dislikes. After discussing the questions he goes on to talk about what people appreciate and how humans commemorate those things with things such as a Hall of Fame. While on this topic he explains what the point of a Hall of Fame is and lists a few people in the music Hall of Fame. He then states that “most of us will not be in the Hall of Fame” and that “God wants to make each of us His masterpiece”. He then claims that all of those famous people are just regular people like us, who have succeeded in a chosen field with the help of someone who sees our potential. He says that they all had someone in the background encouraging them and helping them. God is that person to us and wants to see our full potential. He says that the only way to get to our full potential is to let God do it. As a conclusion, he adds in his daily Scripture verse, which was Ephesians 2:8-10.

Even though most of his statements were true, he still used a lot of fallacies. First, he used the fallacy of and irrelevant thesis when he brought up all of the facts about the Hall of Fame and when he started listing the people in the music Hall of Fame. Secondly, he used snob appeal by making us want to be like those celebrities and do what he says you have to do to get to that point. Thirdly, he uses the fallacy of bifurcation. While it may be true that we need God to get to our full potential, he only gave us two options. It was a good sermon, but it was kind of disorganized and confusing as to how things related.
Labels:

Comments

  1. AnonymousMarch 31, 2016 at 7:27 AM

    I think you did a good job recognizing the fallacies presented in the speaker's sermon, especially when he used the fallacy of bifurcation.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Abby BartonMarch 31, 2016 at 5:59 PM

    I love messages about us being God's masterpieces. It is sad that this one contained fallacies though.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Abigail OverbeyApril 4, 2016 at 9:35 AM

    It is awesome to think he made us in his image and we are his masterpiece good job catching the fallacy.

    Mason

    ReplyDelete
  4. ClaytonApril 5, 2016 at 5:22 PM

    It's cool how we can apply what we learn and pick apart the inconsistencies in other's arguments.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Weight of Glory

In Mr. Cline's class a few weeks ago. We took the day off in a way from our normal classes. Instead of continuing to read the books we were assigned and discussing them, he read us the sermon by C.S Lewis "The Weight of Glory." Its a long sermon, but one worth reading. It is about the confusion many people have on the topic of what we desire the most. He explains after much background information, that we all desire true happiness. And through that happiness, we long for heaven, our true home that we were designed for. He explains that glory is not what many people think of as being "famous" in heaven. But more that we are honored by our Lord and Father. For it to be like the scripture passage "Well done, good and faithful servant." C.S Lewis does a fantastic job at being persuasive here, and if read by the right person aloud, can have an excellent effect. He clears up lots of points that people bring up that are not true. Such as the point of glory...
9 comments
Read more

Stephen Curry (Brita)

I saw this commercial for Brita water on YouTube and on T.V.  Stephen Curry, a professional basketball player that plays for the Golden State Warriors, endorses and promotes the product by saying "not all water is the same."  In this advertisement he makes Brita water seem better than the other leading brands of water by saying "You are what you drink."  He also says "some water can dribble, drain threes, or even drain a buzzer beater."  With these claims, he is implying that drinking the Brita water it could make you better at basketball and help you become better and as good as him. Brita uses a celebrity to sell it by implying that it could improve your basketball performance.  This advertisement is false because water is not going to change your skills and abilities.  It tries to persuade you to buy it because a professional basketball player drinks it.  I feel as though it may persuade some people to buy it because of Stephen Curry endorsing it....
8 comments
Read more

Marilyn Monroe's Shampoo

While browsing on Google I found an old advertisement.  The ad was for Lustre-Crème Shampoo. It featured Marilyn Monroe, known for her beauteous looks and her parts in different movies. One of her movies was Gentlemen Prefer Blondes. Lustre-Crème was attempting to sell their shampoo through the use of fallacies. By saying that Marilyn Monroe that tells you nothing about the actual product: it simply attracts you to the pretty face in the picture. Using this as an argument of why someone should buy your product is quite illogical. Just because Marilyn Monroe uses it doesn’t provide assurance of its abilities. They attempt using snob appeal by trying to make the audience believe that they could be like Marilyn Monroe if they use the same product as her. They use appeal to illegitimate authority by using Marilyn Monroe to promote their product. Although she herself is a customer, this is still rather irrelevant. She herself has no type of expertise in hair products and knows nothing t...
3 comments
Read more