Skip to main content

Teen Saves Drowning Toddler


News broadcasts use rhetoric by grabbing the attention of the viewers by making the news clips short. Also they get your attention with the heading, they put very little information to make you want to read the story or watch the video.

In the video of the teen who rescues the drowning toddler they keep the words going across the bottom of the video to show other news. During this short video of one minute and twenty seconds, they quickly show the girl going into the pool. The reporter makes you feel bad for the child, when she says that the child has been underwater for over two minutes. This is a serious problem, and should not happen again. Although the reporter stresses the fact that this child almost died. This is a good thing, since child should not swimming without adults watching them. This child almost died, because of the lack of care of someone to watch them.

Towards the end of the video they show one of the teens who helped save her life, this makes it seem more real. By hearing the story from one who was involved, makes you feel even worse for the girl. When the worker for the news company tells the story, you feel bad, but it does not seem as real, as when the story is told from the inside. Since the video is so short they have to say as much  as possible and yet it seems like they don’t say much at all. Newscasts do this to keep you watching the news, if they did not grab your attention with every clip no one would watch the news.

Comments

  1. This was really interesting to read about. I feel so badly for the poor girl that was drowning. Just the fact that she was alone long enough to get in the pool and be drowning for 2 minutes before anyone even noticed is so disappointing. I'm just glad the teen noticed her and helped.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Weight of Glory

In Mr. Cline's class a few weeks ago. We took the day off in a way from our normal classes. Instead of continuing to read the books we were assigned and discussing them, he read us the sermon by C.S Lewis "The Weight of Glory." Its a long sermon, but one worth reading. It is about the confusion many people have on the topic of what we desire the most. He explains after much background information, that we all desire true happiness. And through that happiness, we long for heaven, our true home that we were designed for. He explains that glory is not what many people think of as being "famous" in heaven. But more that we are honored by our Lord and Father. For it to be like the scripture passage "Well done, good and faithful servant." C.S Lewis does a fantastic job at being persuasive here, and if read by the right person aloud, can have an excellent effect. He clears up lots of points that people bring up that are not true. Such as the point of glory...

Stephen Curry (Brita)

I saw this commercial for Brita water on YouTube and on T.V.  Stephen Curry, a professional basketball player that plays for the Golden State Warriors, endorses and promotes the product by saying "not all water is the same."  In this advertisement he makes Brita water seem better than the other leading brands of water by saying "You are what you drink."  He also says "some water can dribble, drain threes, or even drain a buzzer beater."  With these claims, he is implying that drinking the Brita water it could make you better at basketball and help you become better and as good as him. Brita uses a celebrity to sell it by implying that it could improve your basketball performance.  This advertisement is false because water is not going to change your skills and abilities.  It tries to persuade you to buy it because a professional basketball player drinks it.  I feel as though it may persuade some people to buy it because of Stephen Curry endorsing it....

Marilyn Monroe's Shampoo

While browsing on Google I found an old advertisement.  The ad was for Lustre-Crème Shampoo. It featured Marilyn Monroe, known for her beauteous looks and her parts in different movies. One of her movies was Gentlemen Prefer Blondes. Lustre-Crème was attempting to sell their shampoo through the use of fallacies. By saying that Marilyn Monroe that tells you nothing about the actual product: it simply attracts you to the pretty face in the picture. Using this as an argument of why someone should buy your product is quite illogical. Just because Marilyn Monroe uses it doesn’t provide assurance of its abilities. They attempt using snob appeal by trying to make the audience believe that they could be like Marilyn Monroe if they use the same product as her. They use appeal to illegitimate authority by using Marilyn Monroe to promote their product. Although she herself is a customer, this is still rather irrelevant. She herself has no type of expertise in hair products and knows nothing t...