Skip to main content

Seven Year Old Unable to Maintain a Single Cohesive Storyline


I was recently surfing on the interwebs and decided to visit America's most trusted news source, The Onion. Out of all the different articles(all of which are completely true) that popped up, one in particular caught my interest the most. The article was titled 7-Year-Old Unable To Maintain Single Cohesive Storyline While Playing With Action Figures. The story grabbed my attention due to the fact that I love a good action figure showdown, and that this child could not tell a proper story with them somewhat bothered me. The author of this article is not stated, but the entire article consists of them criticizing the seven year old Brendan Milner, and describing how all onlookers did as well.

Of course it is proper to critique someone who is not able to maintain a coherent storyline, especially while playing with action figures. This is especially true if those action figures are Iron Man and John Cena. However, Milner is only a child and therefore is likely to jump from plot line to plot line due to his short attention span. In fact, when I was a child I did exactly what Brendon did, because I wanted variety in my story. Despite this, the author's logic is still sound, it doesn't make any sense to have both characters fighting and then make them suddenly become best friends.

The story ultimately becomes impossible to follow for any onlookers due to the irrational plot, but it does make it more interesting for the child. Ultimately the author's rhetorical technique was persuasive and effective in conveying the situation, and demonstrating that Brendon is not good at telling stories. This is true except for one flaw at the end of the article where the author states: “...the ending of his storyline, in which a giant 7-year-old boy came down from the sky and destroyed the Earth, was an excellent twist.” This statement contradicts everything previously stated in the article which ruins his logic entirely.

Comments

  1. Good job Zach. Poor kid, cant just play in peace. Good post though with good points.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with you, Zach. The author is writing an entire article claiming that this seven year old uses far too many plot twists. The large amount of plot changes create a story virtually impossible to follow. How then could the author claim that a final plot twist is, first of all, any different from those previous, and second of all, "excellent" when those talked about before were shown in a negative light? The author has clearly contradicted himself and his logic.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Leave the kid alone. Iron Man fights with his best friend in one of the movies. You do you Brendan.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The skill of adding a good plot twist to a story is very impressive and is only perfected after lots of practice. It is very sad to see this author making fun of a child for practicing the art of a plot twist. It is important for a person to start developing skills for their careers later in life so that they can become real masters of their trade.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I liked this post, but they should just leave the kid alone to play and be a kid. But it is interesting. Good job Zach.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Marilyn Monroe's Shampoo

While browsing on Google I found an old advertisement.  The ad was for Lustre-Crème Shampoo. It featured Marilyn Monroe, known for her beauteous looks and her parts in different movies. One of her movies was Gentlemen Prefer Blondes. Lustre-Crème was attempting to sell their shampoo through the use of fallacies. By saying that Marilyn Monroe that tells you nothing about the actual product: it simply attracts you to the pretty face in the picture. Using this as an argument of why someone should buy your product is quite illogical. Just because Marilyn Monroe uses it doesn’t provide assurance of its abilities. They attempt using snob appeal by trying to make the audience believe that they could be like Marilyn Monroe if they use the same product as her. They use appeal to illegitimate authority by using Marilyn Monroe to promote their product. Although she herself is a customer, this is still rather irrelevant. She herself has no type of expertise in hair products and knows nothing that

Open Happiness

While at the movie theaters to see The Maze Runner , I saw a commercial that featured rhetoric. The commercial begins with a young woman named Jess purchasing two Coca Cola drinks in a convenience store. One has her own name on it, and one has the name of her friend Alisha on it. The cashier watches her forlornly as she leaves, hinting that he has a crush on his customer. Jess gives the Coke with Alisha’s name on it to her friend, and together the two friends drink them. Later, Jess, Alisha and two other friends come back into the store to buy more Coke, then leave and have a good time together. Jess keeps coming back to the store with more and more friends, each time purchasing Coca Cola with their names printed on the labels. The cashier smiles and watches, but it is clear that he wishes he was with Jess.  Finally, as the cashier is closing the store for the night, Jess shows up at the door with a Coke that has the name Chris on it. She smiles and hands the drink to the cash

Wiener Stampede

In this Heinz condiments commercial, aired during the Super Bowl this past year, a group of dachshunds are shown in hot dog costumes running towards humans in Heinz ketchup and mustard costumes who end up catching the dogs as they leap into the humans’ arms and lick their faces. This commercial is a specific appeal to pathos as the dogs are dressed up and are meant to be cute. The phrase at the end of the commercial is “it’s hard to resist great taste” and this is stated while the dogs are licking the humans implying that the dogs like Heinz and that humans should buy it as well because the cute dogs in costumes did.