Skip to main content

The Next Big Thing


There is a Samsung commercial with Seth Rogan and Paul Rudd. The commercial begins with the two of them sitting in a commercial, fighting over who is more equipped to be on a Samsung commercial, as the “Next Big Thing”. They then begin to make jokes at each other, putting each other down. Seth Rogan pulls out a phone, trying to prove to Paul Rudd that he is the “Next Big Thing”, but Paul also has one. The Samsung guy finally comes out and welcomes the two of them, and informs them that they are both the “Next Big Thing” and will work together. The commercial then shows the guys brainstorming on how the make a commercial that will be a really good one. While they are discussing ideas, Lebron James is brought in on a video chat on a tablet.

This commercial uses a lot of ethos in it. Samsung is using famous people like Seth Rogan, Paul Rudd, and Lebron James to get you to want to be a part of the “Next Big Thing”.  Because the commercial uses famous people, it makes you think that if these famous people use Samsung, then it must be a good product. Ethos is about establishing trust, and in American culture, we tend to trust famous people. Also the way the person who plays the Samsung company worker, is wearing a suit, which is also part of ethos.

The commercial also using the fallacy Mob Appeal, making you feel left out if you don’t have a Samsung phone. The commercial wants you to be a part of the “Next Big Thing”.

Another interesting thing to note about this commercial is Seth Rogan suggests that Samsung should put out on the internet that they need ideas, so that they wouldn’t have to think of ideas. This is the kind of thing I think that Postman is getting at. Postman is saying that entertainment is taking over our culture, and it’s interesting to note that even in commercials we are mocking this kind of behavior, and yet Postman is right about our culture’s lack of thinking ability.

Overall, I think that this commercial was effective, because of the famous people that were used in it. Using famous people definitely makes us at least a little bit more inclined to do what the commercial wants, and if not, we are more likely to remember the commercial, which is also want the writers and producers of it want too.
Labels:

Comments

  1. UnknownJanuary 30, 2015 at 3:46 PM

    Good thinking about the commercial referring to Postman's ideas. I hadn't even thought of that.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Abigail OverbeyFebruary 2, 2015 at 6:36 AM

    I love Seth Rogen but I think I’ll stick with my iPhone. It wasn’t convincing enough.

    David

    ReplyDelete
  3. Abigail OverbeyMay 4, 2015 at 6:47 AM

    That commercial totally did have that "Awh!" effect. I love commercials like that.

    Liz

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Open Happiness

While at the movie theaters to see The Maze Runner , I saw a commercial that featured rhetoric. The commercial begins with a young woman named Jess purchasing two Coca Cola drinks in a convenience store. One has her own name on it, and one has the name of her friend Alisha on it. The cashier watches her forlornly as she leaves, hinting that he has a crush on his customer. Jess gives the Coke with Alisha’s name on it to her friend, and together the two friends drink them. Later, Jess, Alisha and two other friends come back into the store to buy more Coke, then leave and have a good time together. Jess keeps coming back to the store with more and more friends, each time purchasing Coca Cola with their names printed on the labels. The cashier smiles and watches, but it is clear that he wishes he was with Jess.  Finally, as the cashier is closing the store for the night, Jess shows up at the door with a Coke that has the name Chris on it. She smiles and hands the drink to the ...
4 comments
Read more

Marilyn Monroe's Shampoo

While browsing on Google I found an old advertisement.  The ad was for Lustre-Crème Shampoo. It featured Marilyn Monroe, known for her beauteous looks and her parts in different movies. One of her movies was Gentlemen Prefer Blondes. Lustre-Crème was attempting to sell their shampoo through the use of fallacies. By saying that Marilyn Monroe that tells you nothing about the actual product: it simply attracts you to the pretty face in the picture. Using this as an argument of why someone should buy your product is quite illogical. Just because Marilyn Monroe uses it doesn’t provide assurance of its abilities. They attempt using snob appeal by trying to make the audience believe that they could be like Marilyn Monroe if they use the same product as her. They use appeal to illegitimate authority by using Marilyn Monroe to promote their product. Although she herself is a customer, this is still rather irrelevant. She herself has no type of expertise in hair products and knows nothing t...
3 comments
Read more

Is Hip Hop a Cancer or a Cure?

The speech I watched was a Ted Talk presented by one of my favorite music artists, who just so happens to be a Christian rapper.  This rapper’s name is Lecrae Moore, but he just goes by Lecrae.  Over the past five years or so, Lecrae has been able to break out of the small box that Christian music and Christian rap have been put in, and he has been able to get his music out to all types of crowds.  So I was actually pretty excited when I saw that he had spoken at a Ted Talk in Nashville.  The speech he delivered was titled, “Heroes and Villains: Is Hip-Hop a Cancer or a Cure?”  In this speech Lecrae talked about how it is easy to look at certain people in history and label them as heroes or villains, but he talks about how not everyone views historical figures the same.  Lecrae started off by defining where we get the words, “Hero” and “Villain”.  Knowing the origin of these words really gave good context for what came to follow.  He then went o...
5 comments
Read more