Skip to main content

Friends Furever

When watching television, we have a tendency to skip over commercials because we are not interested in watching them. We just want the program to come back on, and with all the television channels now available, we can constantly flip through channels, avoiding as many commercials as possible. This creates a challenge for commercial creators. They now must create commercials that catch our eye and make us want to watch them. More and more, commercials are irrelevant to what product they are actually advertising.

I came across a commercial that opened with lots of different animals. It begins showing an orangutan and a dog. It then switches to other animals like baby chicks and a cat, dogs and cats, an elephant and a sheep, a dog and a dolphin and even a dog with an elephant. My favorite is the deer being chased by a dog. The commercial ends with words across the screen saying, “Be together. Not the same.”

I would have never guessed that this commercial was advertising for Android. The first time I saw it I would have guessed that it was for some type of pet food or a commercial like the SPCA ones. I had no idea it was advertising for Android. This commercial is completely irrelevant to what it is trying to get you to buy.  But I think that is what the advertiser wants to think. It shows the animals to make you want to watch the whole thing, because if a commercial isn’t eye catching, then we don’t want to watch it. It plays the different animal clips to keep you watching, even though it is using the fallacy of irrelevant goals or functions.

Using the adorable animals is also using pathos. The cute animal clips are appealing to our emotions and making us say things like “awww” or “how cute”.  They are making us feel good inside and are happy while watching the cute animal clips.

The end of the commercial is very subtle in its reference to what is advertising. The very end it just say Android across the screen. The point of ending it like this, I think, is to make us want to learn more about Android and look up their products. The end leaves us hanging and wondering, wanting to know more.

This commercial was very effective in getting the consumer to do what it wants. Because of the vague connection to the actual product, it leaves the consumer to know more, and therefore will look up more about Android. Its use of pathos is very helpful in keeping the viewer watching until the very end, which can be a challenge for commercials nowadays. I definitely enjoyed watching this commercial.
Labels:

Comments

  1. Kate weberMay 26, 2015 at 1:48 PM

    I think this commercial is effective because people like animals, and companies that support animals rights and such. Having all these animals in their advertisement leads people to believe they are supporters of animals.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Abigail OverbeyMay 27, 2015 at 4:58 AM

    I wrote about this commercial too! I agree with you about how pathos is very effective, especially for people like me who are suckers for cuteness. I loved it!

    Liz

    ReplyDelete
  3. UnknownMay 28, 2015 at 12:37 PM

    I wonder if maybe they were trying to get viewers to think "Maybe if I get an Android phone, my pets will do cute stuff like that too".

    ReplyDelete
  4. Clay BuxtonJune 10, 2015 at 8:34 AM

    Although the actual point of the commercial is not logically correct, the purpose is to show that even if you have different phones, you still all have the same user experience. Perhaps I just take it too literally

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Marilyn Monroe's Shampoo

While browsing on Google I found an old advertisement.  The ad was for Lustre-Crème Shampoo. It featured Marilyn Monroe, known for her beauteous looks and her parts in different movies. One of her movies was Gentlemen Prefer Blondes. Lustre-Crème was attempting to sell their shampoo through the use of fallacies. By saying that Marilyn Monroe that tells you nothing about the actual product: it simply attracts you to the pretty face in the picture. Using this as an argument of why someone should buy your product is quite illogical. Just because Marilyn Monroe uses it doesn’t provide assurance of its abilities. They attempt using snob appeal by trying to make the audience believe that they could be like Marilyn Monroe if they use the same product as her. They use appeal to illegitimate authority by using Marilyn Monroe to promote their product. Although she herself is a customer, this is still rather irrelevant. She herself has no type of expertise in hair products and knows nothing that
3 comments
Read more

Open Happiness

While at the movie theaters to see The Maze Runner , I saw a commercial that featured rhetoric. The commercial begins with a young woman named Jess purchasing two Coca Cola drinks in a convenience store. One has her own name on it, and one has the name of her friend Alisha on it. The cashier watches her forlornly as she leaves, hinting that he has a crush on his customer. Jess gives the Coke with Alisha’s name on it to her friend, and together the two friends drink them. Later, Jess, Alisha and two other friends come back into the store to buy more Coke, then leave and have a good time together. Jess keeps coming back to the store with more and more friends, each time purchasing Coca Cola with their names printed on the labels. The cashier smiles and watches, but it is clear that he wishes he was with Jess.  Finally, as the cashier is closing the store for the night, Jess shows up at the door with a Coke that has the name Chris on it. She smiles and hands the drink to the cash
4 comments
Read more

Is Hip Hop a Cancer or a Cure?

The speech I watched was a Ted Talk presented by one of my favorite music artists, who just so happens to be a Christian rapper.  This rapper’s name is Lecrae Moore, but he just goes by Lecrae.  Over the past five years or so, Lecrae has been able to break out of the small box that Christian music and Christian rap have been put in, and he has been able to get his music out to all types of crowds.  So I was actually pretty excited when I saw that he had spoken at a Ted Talk in Nashville.  The speech he delivered was titled, “Heroes and Villains: Is Hip-Hop a Cancer or a Cure?”  In this speech Lecrae talked about how it is easy to look at certain people in history and label them as heroes or villains, but he talks about how not everyone views historical figures the same.  Lecrae started off by defining where we get the words, “Hero” and “Villain”.  Knowing the origin of these words really gave good context for what came to follow.  He then went on to explain the history of hip-hop.  W
5 comments
Read more