Skip to main content

Selfie Game

I have seen rhetoric used in a commercial for Lg phones. This commercial was a bunch of android phone logos that were in basketball uniforms and playing the game. The commercial wanted to persuade you to buy an Lg phone by saying that “The selfie game is strong” and “be together not the same.” One of the “Lg people” made a slam dunk right before the screen flashed “The selfie game is strong” meaning that because android logos can play basketball, the phone has an amazing camera, this does not make logical sense. They used a fallacy by comparing the ability of the logo to the ability of the camera and used a play on words with “selfie game strong” by using the common language that teenagers use when describing a basketball player with great skill. “Be together not the same” was also trying to get people to buy their phone because they were making a subtle hint that people with iPhones are all the same, and you should buy their phone so  you can express your individuality by still being with the android family. The argument stated had too many fallacies for me to think it was effective, but to people just watching tv, numbed by it, the commercial could look interesting and persuasive. However, I  did not think that the commercial was good because it said nothing about the actual phone or its attributes, just that the selfie game is strong.

Comments

  1. So often there are commercials that say nothing about the product and how it is better than any other products in that line. I saw a similar commercial for iPhone that only had a short video of something like a dog and then after it said shot with iPhone 6. I want to know about a product before I buy it and these commercials don't help

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Weight of Glory

In Mr. Cline's class a few weeks ago. We took the day off in a way from our normal classes. Instead of continuing to read the books we were assigned and discussing them, he read us the sermon by C.S Lewis "The Weight of Glory." Its a long sermon, but one worth reading. It is about the confusion many people have on the topic of what we desire the most. He explains after much background information, that we all desire true happiness. And through that happiness, we long for heaven, our true home that we were designed for. He explains that glory is not what many people think of as being "famous" in heaven. But more that we are honored by our Lord and Father. For it to be like the scripture passage "Well done, good and faithful servant." C.S Lewis does a fantastic job at being persuasive here, and if read by the right person aloud, can have an excellent effect. He clears up lots of points that people bring up that are not true. Such as the point of glory...

Stephen Curry (Brita)

I saw this commercial for Brita water on YouTube and on T.V.  Stephen Curry, a professional basketball player that plays for the Golden State Warriors, endorses and promotes the product by saying "not all water is the same."  In this advertisement he makes Brita water seem better than the other leading brands of water by saying "You are what you drink."  He also says "some water can dribble, drain threes, or even drain a buzzer beater."  With these claims, he is implying that drinking the Brita water it could make you better at basketball and help you become better and as good as him. Brita uses a celebrity to sell it by implying that it could improve your basketball performance.  This advertisement is false because water is not going to change your skills and abilities.  It tries to persuade you to buy it because a professional basketball player drinks it.  I feel as though it may persuade some people to buy it because of Stephen Curry endorsing it....

Marilyn Monroe's Shampoo

While browsing on Google I found an old advertisement.  The ad was for Lustre-Crème Shampoo. It featured Marilyn Monroe, known for her beauteous looks and her parts in different movies. One of her movies was Gentlemen Prefer Blondes. Lustre-Crème was attempting to sell their shampoo through the use of fallacies. By saying that Marilyn Monroe that tells you nothing about the actual product: it simply attracts you to the pretty face in the picture. Using this as an argument of why someone should buy your product is quite illogical. Just because Marilyn Monroe uses it doesn’t provide assurance of its abilities. They attempt using snob appeal by trying to make the audience believe that they could be like Marilyn Monroe if they use the same product as her. They use appeal to illegitimate authority by using Marilyn Monroe to promote their product. Although she herself is a customer, this is still rather irrelevant. She herself has no type of expertise in hair products and knows nothing t...