Skip to main content

Sandisk


One time while I was surfing the internet I came across a commercial from the company Sandisk.  It was a commercial depicting a very pretty and photogenic wedding with very happy and music in the back round.  There were many photographers taking pictures of the wedding with beautiful smiles on their faces.  Then it showed one of the photographers taking a Sandisk SD card out of the camera and putting it in their computer to show the couple their photos.  It then unfocused on the people, and a picture of their products appeared with the caption, “Free up memory, to make more memories.”
This commercial was trying to convince me(the audience) to buy their products.  There was nothing else important that they were trying to do other than for me to buy and use their product.  I think the argument presented wasn't very good, and was flawed in a few ways as well. The only thing they said was that if you buy their product, you can make memories which is not true.  People don't need to take pictures in order to create memories, they can make memories just fine with the brain that they have.  I don't think they mean this exactly as they phrased it though, they really mean “remember more of your memories”.  Even if they do mean this, they still didn't give any reasons for why someone should buy their product and not another company's.
While the commercial did in fact use an appeal to emotion(the happy wedding) and a false cause(extra space makes memories), their technique was effective.  Many people can relate to not being able to take pictures due to no more memory, including myself(something they counted on).  So, this commercial makes you want to buy a product to get more storage, but not necessarily their product.  So while the commercial was appealing, I myself am not going to buy Sandisk's products unless I need more storage or if I do more research on the quality of the product.

Comments

  1. You described the commercial very well. You said what fallacies they used; and I agree. I also think their technique was effective. Good job!

    ReplyDelete
  2. To be honest I am using Sandisk now,this is a nice blog with good describing, this is a successful commercial, nice job.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You had a good opening with telling us how you came across the add. you also did a good job with pointing out the fallacies that were used. bravo.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You did a good job at pointing out what fallacies they used.

    ReplyDelete
  5. you did really good job pointing every fallacies they used in the ad, and making your opinion about the sandisk ad ad going directly to the point i really like it "muy bueno"

    ReplyDelete
  6. I like how you explained the commercial it almost made me feel as if I was watching. I don't think their way of persuading was very effective either.

    ReplyDelete
  7. You did a great job on painting the picture, Zach! It gave me a great idea of what was going on. You also did an awesome job on pointing out what you liked about it, as well as explaining where they went wrong.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Open Happiness

While at the movie theaters to see The Maze Runner , I saw a commercial that featured rhetoric. The commercial begins with a young woman named Jess purchasing two Coca Cola drinks in a convenience store. One has her own name on it, and one has the name of her friend Alisha on it. The cashier watches her forlornly as she leaves, hinting that he has a crush on his customer. Jess gives the Coke with Alisha’s name on it to her friend, and together the two friends drink them. Later, Jess, Alisha and two other friends come back into the store to buy more Coke, then leave and have a good time together. Jess keeps coming back to the store with more and more friends, each time purchasing Coca Cola with their names printed on the labels. The cashier smiles and watches, but it is clear that he wishes he was with Jess.  Finally, as the cashier is closing the store for the night, Jess shows up at the door with a Coke that has the name Chris on it. She smiles and hands the drink to the ...

Marilyn Monroe's Shampoo

While browsing on Google I found an old advertisement.  The ad was for Lustre-Crème Shampoo. It featured Marilyn Monroe, known for her beauteous looks and her parts in different movies. One of her movies was Gentlemen Prefer Blondes. Lustre-Crème was attempting to sell their shampoo through the use of fallacies. By saying that Marilyn Monroe that tells you nothing about the actual product: it simply attracts you to the pretty face in the picture. Using this as an argument of why someone should buy your product is quite illogical. Just because Marilyn Monroe uses it doesn’t provide assurance of its abilities. They attempt using snob appeal by trying to make the audience believe that they could be like Marilyn Monroe if they use the same product as her. They use appeal to illegitimate authority by using Marilyn Monroe to promote their product. Although she herself is a customer, this is still rather irrelevant. She herself has no type of expertise in hair products and knows nothing t...

Is Hip Hop a Cancer or a Cure?

The speech I watched was a Ted Talk presented by one of my favorite music artists, who just so happens to be a Christian rapper.  This rapper’s name is Lecrae Moore, but he just goes by Lecrae.  Over the past five years or so, Lecrae has been able to break out of the small box that Christian music and Christian rap have been put in, and he has been able to get his music out to all types of crowds.  So I was actually pretty excited when I saw that he had spoken at a Ted Talk in Nashville.  The speech he delivered was titled, “Heroes and Villains: Is Hip-Hop a Cancer or a Cure?”  In this speech Lecrae talked about how it is easy to look at certain people in history and label them as heroes or villains, but he talks about how not everyone views historical figures the same.  Lecrae started off by defining where we get the words, “Hero” and “Villain”.  Knowing the origin of these words really gave good context for what came to follow.  He then went o...