Skip to main content

T.S.A. Trains Dogs to Stay One Sniff Ahead of Bomb Makers

I recently read a New York Times article titled "T.S.A. Trains Dogs to Stay One Sniff Ahead of Bomb Makers."  It caught my interest because I love animals, especially dogs.  Like every article, it was full of rhetoric techniques.  It was all about dogs being the best way to detect bombs and chemicals that could be combined to make bombs.  It expressed that training them to detect a bomb is hard enough, but now they have to be trained to detect individual chemicals that could be used in bomb-making.  The article went through how they train the dogs and all the situations that they are trained to be in.

The author started by giving the reader a situation.  He set the scene by describing Ajax, a dog, sniffing around a furnished room early in the morning looking for explosives.  After a couple tries, Ajax finds the explosives and is rewarded by his trainer.  This was a good way to immediately catch the reader’s attention and engage them in the article.  This was a great use of rhetoric.

I also liked how the author took a complex subject and made it readable.  Even when he named specific chemicals, he always explained what they were..  He used credible sources throughout the article (ethos) and he did a great job of summarizing the training that the dogs go through without making it boring.  He used pathos throughout the article by making the reader proud of how much the dogs have accomplished throughout their many years of training.

This article made logical sense and was well put together.  It wasn’t meant to persuade people.  It was an informative article.  It caught my attention and kept it throughout.  It was a good use of rhetoric.
Labels:

Comments

  1. LexieOctober 5, 2016 at 5:05 PM

    I think this is an interesting blog post because of the fact that they are now training dogs not only to sniff out bombs, but to sniff out the chemicals used in the making of bombs.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Abigail OverbeyOctober 6, 2016 at 7:52 AM

    This is very smart to be able to prevent bombs being made illegally.

    David Jones

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousOctober 6, 2016 at 6:43 PM

    This post is very interesting because it shows a solution to a problem we have seen for so long. Now that the dogs can sniff out the chemicals they can be more precise in finding the bombs that are out there.

    ReplyDelete
  4. UnknownNovember 4, 2016 at 4:22 AM

    This was an intelligent thing to do. Its solves many problems that we have. Good article.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Open Happiness

While at the movie theaters to see The Maze Runner , I saw a commercial that featured rhetoric. The commercial begins with a young woman named Jess purchasing two Coca Cola drinks in a convenience store. One has her own name on it, and one has the name of her friend Alisha on it. The cashier watches her forlornly as she leaves, hinting that he has a crush on his customer. Jess gives the Coke with Alisha’s name on it to her friend, and together the two friends drink them. Later, Jess, Alisha and two other friends come back into the store to buy more Coke, then leave and have a good time together. Jess keeps coming back to the store with more and more friends, each time purchasing Coca Cola with their names printed on the labels. The cashier smiles and watches, but it is clear that he wishes he was with Jess.  Finally, as the cashier is closing the store for the night, Jess shows up at the door with a Coke that has the name Chris on it. She smiles and hands the drink to the ...
4 comments
Read more

Marilyn Monroe's Shampoo

While browsing on Google I found an old advertisement.  The ad was for Lustre-Crème Shampoo. It featured Marilyn Monroe, known for her beauteous looks and her parts in different movies. One of her movies was Gentlemen Prefer Blondes. Lustre-Crème was attempting to sell their shampoo through the use of fallacies. By saying that Marilyn Monroe that tells you nothing about the actual product: it simply attracts you to the pretty face in the picture. Using this as an argument of why someone should buy your product is quite illogical. Just because Marilyn Monroe uses it doesn’t provide assurance of its abilities. They attempt using snob appeal by trying to make the audience believe that they could be like Marilyn Monroe if they use the same product as her. They use appeal to illegitimate authority by using Marilyn Monroe to promote their product. Although she herself is a customer, this is still rather irrelevant. She herself has no type of expertise in hair products and knows nothing t...
3 comments
Read more

Is Hip Hop a Cancer or a Cure?

The speech I watched was a Ted Talk presented by one of my favorite music artists, who just so happens to be a Christian rapper.  This rapper’s name is Lecrae Moore, but he just goes by Lecrae.  Over the past five years or so, Lecrae has been able to break out of the small box that Christian music and Christian rap have been put in, and he has been able to get his music out to all types of crowds.  So I was actually pretty excited when I saw that he had spoken at a Ted Talk in Nashville.  The speech he delivered was titled, “Heroes and Villains: Is Hip-Hop a Cancer or a Cure?”  In this speech Lecrae talked about how it is easy to look at certain people in history and label them as heroes or villains, but he talks about how not everyone views historical figures the same.  Lecrae started off by defining where we get the words, “Hero” and “Villain”.  Knowing the origin of these words really gave good context for what came to follow.  He then went o...
5 comments
Read more