Skip to main content

President Trump Addresses Congress


This past Tuesday, February 28th, Donald Trump gave his first address to congress. Trump’s speech was considered by most as a massive success for any President, let only one that has historically low approval ratings. In fact, the approval rating for his speech, at seventy percent, is almost double his actual approval rating at forty-three percent. The speech mainly consisted of Trump elaborating on his vague presidential platform. He urged congress to replace Obamacare, support his new government agency V.O.I.C.E. ( Victims of Immigration Crime Enforcement office), and spend one trillion dollars on infrastructure. The reason Trump’s speech was so successfully was because it was the first time that he seemed presidential. The speech, which was mostly scripted, kept Trump from saying any outrageous statements, similar to the ones that got him elected.

Trump’s speech was full or rhetorical examples, which is unusual for someone that speaks so exhaustingly without giving much thought to what he is saying ( He did not write it, a paid speech writer probably did). There was some logos and ethos mixed into his address. It was the first time Trump really made himself seem presidential, immediately giving him ethos. In using logos trump provided logical solutions to issues that he recognized but never previously expended on them. Perhaps, Trump’s best use of rhetoric was when he used pathos by recognizing multiple people that had been through tragedy but had prevailed, specifically when he called upon the widow of a Navy Seal. This moment was especially impactful, because of how much emotion she showed and how much of a standing ovation she received. It was a truly inspirational, as well as rhetorical, moment. Trump’s speech was received well, mostly because it was well written, it was delivered well, and had an adequate amount of rhetoric involved.

Comments

  1. I agree with you about the president's speech. He finally gave the American public a speech that they could respect and some points that they actually cared about. By the way, it looks like someone REALLY wanted an acronym that spelled VOICE.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Weight of Glory

In Mr. Cline's class a few weeks ago. We took the day off in a way from our normal classes. Instead of continuing to read the books we were assigned and discussing them, he read us the sermon by C.S Lewis "The Weight of Glory." Its a long sermon, but one worth reading. It is about the confusion many people have on the topic of what we desire the most. He explains after much background information, that we all desire true happiness. And through that happiness, we long for heaven, our true home that we were designed for. He explains that glory is not what many people think of as being "famous" in heaven. But more that we are honored by our Lord and Father. For it to be like the scripture passage "Well done, good and faithful servant." C.S Lewis does a fantastic job at being persuasive here, and if read by the right person aloud, can have an excellent effect. He clears up lots of points that people bring up that are not true. Such as the point of glory...

Marilyn Monroe's Shampoo

While browsing on Google I found an old advertisement.  The ad was for Lustre-Crème Shampoo. It featured Marilyn Monroe, known for her beauteous looks and her parts in different movies. One of her movies was Gentlemen Prefer Blondes. Lustre-Crème was attempting to sell their shampoo through the use of fallacies. By saying that Marilyn Monroe that tells you nothing about the actual product: it simply attracts you to the pretty face in the picture. Using this as an argument of why someone should buy your product is quite illogical. Just because Marilyn Monroe uses it doesn’t provide assurance of its abilities. They attempt using snob appeal by trying to make the audience believe that they could be like Marilyn Monroe if they use the same product as her. They use appeal to illegitimate authority by using Marilyn Monroe to promote their product. Although she herself is a customer, this is still rather irrelevant. She herself has no type of expertise in hair products and knows nothing t...

Stephen Curry (Brita)

I saw this commercial for Brita water on YouTube and on T.V.  Stephen Curry, a professional basketball player that plays for the Golden State Warriors, endorses and promotes the product by saying "not all water is the same."  In this advertisement he makes Brita water seem better than the other leading brands of water by saying "You are what you drink."  He also says "some water can dribble, drain threes, or even drain a buzzer beater."  With these claims, he is implying that drinking the Brita water it could make you better at basketball and help you become better and as good as him. Brita uses a celebrity to sell it by implying that it could improve your basketball performance.  This advertisement is false because water is not going to change your skills and abilities.  It tries to persuade you to buy it because a professional basketball player drinks it.  I feel as though it may persuade some people to buy it because of Stephen Curry endorsing it....