Skip to main content

Trump v.Clinton: Late Term Abortions

In this debate, Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump were asked about Roe vs. Wade and late term abortions. Trump takes the stance that abortion should be illegal while Hillary defends women having the right to choose.

Trump avoids the speaker’s first question by dancing around his answer about overturning the Roe v Wade agreement while Hillary is very adamant that she strongly supports Roe v Wade.
Hillary immediately accuses Trump of using “scare” rhetoric when he describes abortion as “ripping a baby out of its womb”. I believe that personal beliefs should have been set aside and the concerns of society should have been their main focus.

There did not seem to be many instances of rhetoric used during this debate as it was more straight forward with the opinions of the opposing sides. Pathos was present slightly on Hillary’s behalf when she gets deeper into the emotional stress the choice of abortion is for women.
In conclusion I would agree that Trump did use scare rhetoric but on the other hand Hillary also made it very dramatic by talking about women's rights.

Comments

  1. Having seen other Trump v Hillary debates I'm unsurprised by your analysis of the debate.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Open Happiness

While at the movie theaters to see The Maze Runner , I saw a commercial that featured rhetoric. The commercial begins with a young woman named Jess purchasing two Coca Cola drinks in a convenience store. One has her own name on it, and one has the name of her friend Alisha on it. The cashier watches her forlornly as she leaves, hinting that he has a crush on his customer. Jess gives the Coke with Alisha’s name on it to her friend, and together the two friends drink them. Later, Jess, Alisha and two other friends come back into the store to buy more Coke, then leave and have a good time together. Jess keeps coming back to the store with more and more friends, each time purchasing Coca Cola with their names printed on the labels. The cashier smiles and watches, but it is clear that he wishes he was with Jess.  Finally, as the cashier is closing the store for the night, Jess shows up at the door with a Coke that has the name Chris on it. She smiles and hands the drink to the ...

Wiener Stampede

In this Heinz condiments commercial, aired during the Super Bowl this past year, a group of dachshunds are shown in hot dog costumes running towards humans in Heinz ketchup and mustard costumes who end up catching the dogs as they leap into the humans’ arms and lick their faces. This commercial is a specific appeal to pathos as the dogs are dressed up and are meant to be cute. The phrase at the end of the commercial is “it’s hard to resist great taste” and this is stated while the dogs are licking the humans implying that the dogs like Heinz and that humans should buy it as well because the cute dogs in costumes did.

You're Not You When You're Hungry

During a Super Bowl commercial in 2010, Snickers aired their commercial featuring Betty White, a 5-time Emmy nominee. She is portrayed as a football player playing with other middle aged grown men, but she is not herself. They are playing on a mud-covered field so they are all wet and dirty. They start playing and the ball is thrown to her, but she is tackled and thrown into a pile of mud. She gets up and walks back to the huddle all angry, covered in mud, and with a limp. One of the guys criticizes her for her poor performance and she chirps back with a sarcastic response. Then one of her friends brings over a snickers bar and says, “Eat a Snickers.” Immediately after this Betty White turns back into a middle aged man and is able to play football again. Snickers ends the commercial with, “You’re not you when you’re hungry.” In my opinion this commercial uses Ethos. Betty White is a 5 time Emmy nominee and one of the all-time best female actresses. She is a lovable 95 year-old lad...