Skip to main content

What a Driverless World Would Look Like

In this Ted Talk, Wanis Kabbaj describes a world where there are no traffic jams and how beneficial it could be. He begins his speech with pictures of cities with different scenarios, which is a good way to grab the audience’s attention. He continues to use pictures throughout his speech to help portray what he is saying. Wanis brings up the idea of flying cars and how a company known as “Air Bus” has been successful in creating urban flying taxis. Although flying cars could solve traffic jams, he points out a better way to eliminate traffic. He compares transportation with the vascular system and informs the audience that red blood cells use up all the space they can without creating jams. This is the way he thought transportation should look like. Wanis thinks that it is possible to create vehicles that combine the convenience of cars with the efficiency that trains and buses possess. He designed a train in his head that is made up of several wagons. The wagons can detach dynamically as it is moving. Therefore, no one would have to wait another seven stops before they reach their destination. The wagons can detach and drive their passenger right to their doorstep. These special types of trains can be programmed to do this and would not need drivers. This would eliminate the need for stop lights, lanes, and speed limits. Everything would be predictable and reaction time would be kept at a minimum.

Wanis primarily uses logos by explaining to the audience the reasoning and design behind his plans and visions. He uses statistics to explain the issue of traffic. For example, he said that 30% of urban traffic is due to drivers looking for parking spaces. He makes eye-contact with the audience throughout his entire speech, uses hand gestures, and inflection of voice. Part of his style included using humor and asking the audience rhetorical questions. This helped keep the audience engaged and listen. He also kept the audience engaged by asking them to put themselves in different scenarios. Wanis constantly had a smile on his face, which made him pleasant to watch and listen to. Overall, he presented his speech in a rhetorically pleasing way.

Comments

  1. I was actually just reading about the issue of parking a few weeks ago. In San Fransisco, which is statistically the worst city in the world to park, approxiamtely seventy percent of the time someone is driving they are simply looking for a parking space. Tesla recently created their own self driving car which actually creates data about its driving so that newer models will drive better. If this data collection could be used to identify where there are empty parking space traffic and be reduced and ultimately carbon emissions will be reduced.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is a great analysis of this speech. His idea is very clever and would be very interesting to see brought to life. This is a great post and is written very well

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is a very interesting idea. Traffic jams are certainly problems that our society needs a solution for. The presenter also seems to use rhetoric effectively.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree that he used an attention grabbing introduction. I also agree that when a speaker smiles and engages with the audience and keeps them involved and interested, it makes for a better argument. Great job Lex.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This is a really cool idea. I like how it is very futuristic. It would be a lot different since traffic is part of everyday life

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Weight of Glory

In Mr. Cline's class a few weeks ago. We took the day off in a way from our normal classes. Instead of continuing to read the books we were assigned and discussing them, he read us the sermon by C.S Lewis "The Weight of Glory." Its a long sermon, but one worth reading. It is about the confusion many people have on the topic of what we desire the most. He explains after much background information, that we all desire true happiness. And through that happiness, we long for heaven, our true home that we were designed for. He explains that glory is not what many people think of as being "famous" in heaven. But more that we are honored by our Lord and Father. For it to be like the scripture passage "Well done, good and faithful servant." C.S Lewis does a fantastic job at being persuasive here, and if read by the right person aloud, can have an excellent effect. He clears up lots of points that people bring up that are not true. Such as the point of glory...

Marilyn Monroe's Shampoo

While browsing on Google I found an old advertisement.  The ad was for Lustre-Crème Shampoo. It featured Marilyn Monroe, known for her beauteous looks and her parts in different movies. One of her movies was Gentlemen Prefer Blondes. Lustre-Crème was attempting to sell their shampoo through the use of fallacies. By saying that Marilyn Monroe that tells you nothing about the actual product: it simply attracts you to the pretty face in the picture. Using this as an argument of why someone should buy your product is quite illogical. Just because Marilyn Monroe uses it doesn’t provide assurance of its abilities. They attempt using snob appeal by trying to make the audience believe that they could be like Marilyn Monroe if they use the same product as her. They use appeal to illegitimate authority by using Marilyn Monroe to promote their product. Although she herself is a customer, this is still rather irrelevant. She herself has no type of expertise in hair products and knows nothing t...

Stephen Curry (Brita)

I saw this commercial for Brita water on YouTube and on T.V.  Stephen Curry, a professional basketball player that plays for the Golden State Warriors, endorses and promotes the product by saying "not all water is the same."  In this advertisement he makes Brita water seem better than the other leading brands of water by saying "You are what you drink."  He also says "some water can dribble, drain threes, or even drain a buzzer beater."  With these claims, he is implying that drinking the Brita water it could make you better at basketball and help you become better and as good as him. Brita uses a celebrity to sell it by implying that it could improve your basketball performance.  This advertisement is false because water is not going to change your skills and abilities.  It tries to persuade you to buy it because a professional basketball player drinks it.  I feel as though it may persuade some people to buy it because of Stephen Curry endorsing it....