Skip to main content

Brady Everyday


During the 2017 Super Bowl, a commercial came on advertising Intel’s new Intel 360 Replay. The commercial stars the New England Patriots star quarterback Tom Brady. The narrator of the commercial begins by saying, “Intel 360 Replay makes anything look epic.” The commercial then proceeds to show the audience the things Mr. Brady does as part of his morning routine such as get up, brush his teeth, and make his breakfast.

Logos is poorly used in this commercial because it is not sharing many reasons as to why this product is a practical buy. It does have a small appeal to logos. At the end of the commercial, the narrator says, “Wait till you see it in the game”. It appears that the makers of the product are implying that its best use would be in the case of a sporting event. They do not make this very obvious. This commercial would be more persuasive in the aspect of logos if it gave more reasons besides it being good for athletic events.

The main use of persuasion in the commercial is ethos although it is poorly used. Tom Brady is a professional football player but not a computer specialist. Although it is possible for Tom Brady to use the product, it is probably not very likely. In order for them to use proper ethos they should have used someone like Bill Gates or Steve Jobs (even though he is dead) because they contributed to the advancement of technology.

This commercial does not use pathos. Although it is a little funny at the end when the camera tries to follow Tom Brady into the bathroom, and he says, “Enough! They get it.”, the main point of the commercial is not to make them laugh. It is more trying to persuade people that they want the product because Tom Brady uses it and it’s effective and useful.

Comments

  1. I guess the last lousy habit a man will give up is advising, but I am obliged to submit a criticizing comment on your blog post, and I wished my suggestion would be worthy enough for you acceptance.
    Different than your opinion, I believe Pathos was used in this commercial, for its objective was to make people believe Intel's product "makes everything look epic" and I believe they were succeed in their purpose, because for right now my mind is full of "epic images" as if I have this product.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This article is well organized with the paragraphs and that youtube video clip helped me to understand the article better. Also she pointed out the problem of article using ethos, pathos, and logos. I believe it is very organized and great article.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Very well written, I enjoyed your remarks in your logos paragraph.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Julianne, I really liked how you reasoned each of the rhetorical appeals in your blog. You thoroughly based the commercial on how it was effective. Great job!

    Lea

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Weight of Glory

In Mr. Cline's class a few weeks ago. We took the day off in a way from our normal classes. Instead of continuing to read the books we were assigned and discussing them, he read us the sermon by C.S Lewis "The Weight of Glory." Its a long sermon, but one worth reading. It is about the confusion many people have on the topic of what we desire the most. He explains after much background information, that we all desire true happiness. And through that happiness, we long for heaven, our true home that we were designed for. He explains that glory is not what many people think of as being "famous" in heaven. But more that we are honored by our Lord and Father. For it to be like the scripture passage "Well done, good and faithful servant." C.S Lewis does a fantastic job at being persuasive here, and if read by the right person aloud, can have an excellent effect. He clears up lots of points that people bring up that are not true. Such as the point of glory...

Stephen Curry (Brita)

I saw this commercial for Brita water on YouTube and on T.V.  Stephen Curry, a professional basketball player that plays for the Golden State Warriors, endorses and promotes the product by saying "not all water is the same."  In this advertisement he makes Brita water seem better than the other leading brands of water by saying "You are what you drink."  He also says "some water can dribble, drain threes, or even drain a buzzer beater."  With these claims, he is implying that drinking the Brita water it could make you better at basketball and help you become better and as good as him. Brita uses a celebrity to sell it by implying that it could improve your basketball performance.  This advertisement is false because water is not going to change your skills and abilities.  It tries to persuade you to buy it because a professional basketball player drinks it.  I feel as though it may persuade some people to buy it because of Stephen Curry endorsing it....

Marilyn Monroe's Shampoo

While browsing on Google I found an old advertisement.  The ad was for Lustre-Crème Shampoo. It featured Marilyn Monroe, known for her beauteous looks and her parts in different movies. One of her movies was Gentlemen Prefer Blondes. Lustre-Crème was attempting to sell their shampoo through the use of fallacies. By saying that Marilyn Monroe that tells you nothing about the actual product: it simply attracts you to the pretty face in the picture. Using this as an argument of why someone should buy your product is quite illogical. Just because Marilyn Monroe uses it doesn’t provide assurance of its abilities. They attempt using snob appeal by trying to make the audience believe that they could be like Marilyn Monroe if they use the same product as her. They use appeal to illegitimate authority by using Marilyn Monroe to promote their product. Although she herself is a customer, this is still rather irrelevant. She herself has no type of expertise in hair products and knows nothing t...