Skip to main content

UNICEF

I found rhetoric used in a Korean promotional video for UNICEF. It starts with sad music and shows pictures of poor children in Africa who are sitting on a dirty floor and studying in poor surroundings. After that, the most handsome and famous actor in Korea shows up. He is playing with skinny kids who look really starved and tired but are smiling at the camera. It also shows sick children lying in bed with hopeless faces. The Korean actor then strokes their cheeks and gives them a lot of hugs and medicine with a gentle smile. He narrates some touching words like, “The children I met still live in my heart. All children should be healthy and happy but there are so many children starving and suffering from diseases. They need your love. Their lives can change with your little help. Please give them hope.”

The advertisement uses sound and photographs to appeal to the viewers’ emotions. Stirring music and pictures of poor, starving children make us feel pity for them and make us feel like we could really give them hope. Also, the video uses the handsome and popular actor to draw people’s attentions. Also, by seeing the famous actor participating in helping children and by listening to what he says, people will think they should also take part because he is famous and trustworthy.

I think the argument of the video is reasonable and the tactics it used are persuasive. I was moved by the starving, sick children and even more moved when I saw them smile. The actor did his part, too, because he is one of my favorite celebrities. I was enticed to watch him and therefore the video. Even though I wasn’t able to donate money because I didn’t have much money and I wasn’t old enough to participate either, my mom and grandfather called UNICEF right away and subscribed to be monthly contributors. Now my mom is sponsoring about 10 children.

Comments

  1. I think that's awesome that your mom is sponsoring children, Julia! :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think something we over look a lot in advertising, though, that you pointed out is how they use sound. Sound can be a big part of an advertisement, like in this one when they played sad music in the beginning. That music made the whole picture of the little starving kids with their smiles all the more sweetly tragic. Isn’t it interesting how advertisements try to reach our emotions in so many ways?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I don't think they should make them so sad, everyone skips over them cause they don't want to cry. But all their doing is wanting pity for money. Such Cry, many sadnessess

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think this video you are talking about just shows how much our society revolves around celebrities and pop culture. If a regular citizen did this in a video it would probably not be as effective. I think it's good that celebrities are able to use their fame for a good cause though! If one of my favorite celebrities did this, I might want to donate as well.

    Liz

    ReplyDelete
  5. Part of the most powerful part of this commercial is the use of children. Sad kids make us want to do things and help them, especially when they use sad music. The commercial is also using pathos when saying things like "They need love. Their lives can change with your little help." This is an emotional appeal.

    Kaitlyn

    ReplyDelete
  6. The music really does make a difference! They always have sad music when they ask for money, whether it's for the SPCA, sponsoring Indian children, or funding education for children in Africa.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Weight of Glory

In Mr. Cline's class a few weeks ago. We took the day off in a way from our normal classes. Instead of continuing to read the books we were assigned and discussing them, he read us the sermon by C.S Lewis "The Weight of Glory." Its a long sermon, but one worth reading. It is about the confusion many people have on the topic of what we desire the most. He explains after much background information, that we all desire true happiness. And through that happiness, we long for heaven, our true home that we were designed for. He explains that glory is not what many people think of as being "famous" in heaven. But more that we are honored by our Lord and Father. For it to be like the scripture passage "Well done, good and faithful servant." C.S Lewis does a fantastic job at being persuasive here, and if read by the right person aloud, can have an excellent effect. He clears up lots of points that people bring up that are not true. Such as the point of glory...

Stephen Curry (Brita)

I saw this commercial for Brita water on YouTube and on T.V.  Stephen Curry, a professional basketball player that plays for the Golden State Warriors, endorses and promotes the product by saying "not all water is the same."  In this advertisement he makes Brita water seem better than the other leading brands of water by saying "You are what you drink."  He also says "some water can dribble, drain threes, or even drain a buzzer beater."  With these claims, he is implying that drinking the Brita water it could make you better at basketball and help you become better and as good as him. Brita uses a celebrity to sell it by implying that it could improve your basketball performance.  This advertisement is false because water is not going to change your skills and abilities.  It tries to persuade you to buy it because a professional basketball player drinks it.  I feel as though it may persuade some people to buy it because of Stephen Curry endorsing it....

Marilyn Monroe's Shampoo

While browsing on Google I found an old advertisement.  The ad was for Lustre-Crème Shampoo. It featured Marilyn Monroe, known for her beauteous looks and her parts in different movies. One of her movies was Gentlemen Prefer Blondes. Lustre-Crème was attempting to sell their shampoo through the use of fallacies. By saying that Marilyn Monroe that tells you nothing about the actual product: it simply attracts you to the pretty face in the picture. Using this as an argument of why someone should buy your product is quite illogical. Just because Marilyn Monroe uses it doesn’t provide assurance of its abilities. They attempt using snob appeal by trying to make the audience believe that they could be like Marilyn Monroe if they use the same product as her. They use appeal to illegitimate authority by using Marilyn Monroe to promote their product. Although she herself is a customer, this is still rather irrelevant. She herself has no type of expertise in hair products and knows nothing t...