Skip to main content

A Futuristic Vision in the Age of Holograms



Recently I watched a TED talk done by speaker Alex Kipman on the topic of modern technology, more specifically the topic of holograms. He went on about how today’s society, despite being as advanced as we currently are, are still like the cavemen, first discovering charcoal and making markings on cave walls. No one in today’s day of age wants to be behind on the latest and newest technology, so by claiming that we are still living as though ancients, people are more motivated to listen and acknowledge.

Continuing in his presentation, Kipman proceeds to demonstrate the Microsoft HoloLens. By doing so, he provides the audience with visuals of what technology can really accomplish. Although while this was occurring, I found myself more focused on the holograms being displayed rather than what the speaker was actually presenting, leading me to simply assume the speaker was saying relevant and intelligent things. Upon rewatching the presentation, I focused more on what Kipman was saying rather than the demonstration itself. When I did this I realized that Kipman was simply repeating the same ideas, just in different context. I found it interesting how convincing the speaker was when putting the displays along with his presentation of ideas. Imagery seemed to add a sense of entertainment, which helps by capturing the attention of the audience and helping to get your main ideas across.

Kipman brings to the stage a hologram of Dr. Jeffrey Norris, from NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Not only does he appeal to credibility by doing so, but he appeals to the audience in the sense that it captures the attentions and amazes them. I feel as though this was an effective way to bring the research and ideas of Norris to the presentation because it was interesting and entertaining. Once this demonstration occurred, people wanted to hear more about what this holographic figure had to say.

Overall, despite repetitiveness in his speech, Kipman presented his main points in an effective manner by using displays and demonstrations that appeal to the wonder and amazement of the audience, which effectively captured their attentions.

Comments

  1. Pshhh... Ridiculous. Oh no no, not the holograms, Kipman, not a very good speaker from what you've pointed out, Hannah. Thanks for the insight and for preventing me from thinking that this guy took Rhetoric class.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Wiener Stampede

In this Heinz condiments commercial, aired during the Super Bowl this past year, a group of dachshunds are shown in hot dog costumes running towards humans in Heinz ketchup and mustard costumes who end up catching the dogs as they leap into the humans’ arms and lick their faces. This commercial is a specific appeal to pathos as the dogs are dressed up and are meant to be cute. The phrase at the end of the commercial is “it’s hard to resist great taste” and this is stated while the dogs are licking the humans implying that the dogs like Heinz and that humans should buy it as well because the cute dogs in costumes did.

Marilyn Monroe's Shampoo

While browsing on Google I found an old advertisement.  The ad was for Lustre-Crème Shampoo. It featured Marilyn Monroe, known for her beauteous looks and her parts in different movies. One of her movies was Gentlemen Prefer Blondes. Lustre-Crème was attempting to sell their shampoo through the use of fallacies. By saying that Marilyn Monroe that tells you nothing about the actual product: it simply attracts you to the pretty face in the picture. Using this as an argument of why someone should buy your product is quite illogical. Just because Marilyn Monroe uses it doesn’t provide assurance of its abilities. They attempt using snob appeal by trying to make the audience believe that they could be like Marilyn Monroe if they use the same product as her. They use appeal to illegitimate authority by using Marilyn Monroe to promote their product. Although she herself is a customer, this is still rather irrelevant. She herself has no type of expertise in hair products and knows nothing t...

I Hate Steven Singer

Have you seen this? Anyone travelling through the Philadelphia area has seen this billboard. It simply states, “I hate Steven Singer!” This expression of seemingly unprovoked hatred for a random man appears to be the object of an angered citizen. However, it does get the attention of the individual who saw it. Because the individual saw it, she will Google it on her handy dandy smartphone. There, she will click on the link to the story that sparks this creative ruse of a billboard. She will find that the quote, “I hate Steven Singer!” is actually the utterance of a customer who bought an engagement ring for his fiancé and later another ring to commemorate their twentieth anniversary, resulting in a baby shortly later. He then stated these four words and inspired this phenomenon, all due to the amazing skill of the advertisement team at Steven Singer Jewelers. Though it is kind of a far stretch, this advertisement wanted to draw attention to Steven Singer Jewelers and attempt to ge...