Since it is the last day of school and I still needed to do my blogpost, my natural reaction was to go on CNN and find a story. I saw stories about the presidential candidates and how Kim Jong Un was smoking during an anti-smoking event. Then I saw a story of a Stanford girl who was raped. I didn’t hear about the story until Wednesday when I overheard a group of friends talking about it. I won’t go into detail about what happened to the girl, but I will talk about the main controversy over the whole situation. The average time for rapist being convicted is 9.8 years and the average time served is 5.4 years, but the man who committed the crime was only sentenced to 6 months and can get out on 3 months for good behavior. Once he gets released he will be a registered sex offender and won’t be able to live within 1,000 feet of a school or childcare facility.
There are two different sides to this story, the story of the man and the story of the victim. A lot of news stories were using pathos and logos to defend the man. They said if he was convicted of a harsher sentence, it would ruin his life and he would have no future. They also said that they victim had it coming, getting drunk and passing out. They try and use rhetoric to make you feel bad for the man. The other side of the story was the one of the victim. She wrote her own personal statement to the judge about the situation. I don't think she was trying to use rhetoric and make people feel bad, but she was sincerely writing her story. The whole situation is bad and I feel very bad for the girl, I hope the situation gets better for her.
There are two different sides to this story, the story of the man and the story of the victim. A lot of news stories were using pathos and logos to defend the man. They said if he was convicted of a harsher sentence, it would ruin his life and he would have no future. They also said that they victim had it coming, getting drunk and passing out. They try and use rhetoric to make you feel bad for the man. The other side of the story was the one of the victim. She wrote her own personal statement to the judge about the situation. I don't think she was trying to use rhetoric and make people feel bad, but she was sincerely writing her story. The whole situation is bad and I feel very bad for the girl, I hope the situation gets better for her.
Both the defense of the boy and the critics of the decision seem to use pathos as their main source of persuasion.
ReplyDeleteI would love to see more information in this post as it seems rushed. I would also like to see specific uses of pathos and logos. It is an extremely controversial topic though and it showcases the sinful world that we live in.
ReplyDeleteThis is a very sad article and it is tough how to feel about it. Though there are good arguments justifying why Turner should be let go in that time and all that, it still does not make what he did right. Rhetoric is extremely active when it comes to crimes as, like Brennan said, there are two very real sides. Overall this post was well written and very informational.
ReplyDeleteCaleb