Skip to main content

Outrage Over 6 Month Sentence for Brock Turner

Since it is the last day of school and I still needed to do my blogpost, my natural reaction was to go on CNN and find a story. I saw stories about the presidential candidates and how Kim Jong Un was smoking during an anti-smoking event. Then I saw a story of a Stanford girl who was raped. I didn’t hear about the story until Wednesday when I overheard a group of friends talking about it. I won’t go into detail about what happened to the girl, but I will talk about the main controversy over the whole situation. The average time for rapist being convicted is 9.8 years and the average time served is 5.4 years, but the man who committed the crime was only sentenced to 6 months and can get out on 3 months for good behavior. Once he gets released he will be a registered sex offender and won’t be able to live within 1,000 feet of a school or childcare facility.

There are two different sides to this story, the story of the man and the story of the victim. A lot of news stories were using pathos and logos to defend the man. They said if he was convicted of a harsher sentence, it would ruin his life and he would have no future. They also said that they victim had it coming, getting drunk and passing out. They try and use rhetoric to make you feel bad for the man. The other side of the story was the one of the victim. She wrote her own personal statement to the judge about the situation. I don't think she was trying to use rhetoric and make people feel bad, but she was sincerely writing her story. The whole situation is bad and I feel very bad for the girl, I hope the situation gets better for her.

Comments

  1. Both the defense of the boy and the critics of the decision seem to use pathos as their main source of persuasion.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I would love to see more information in this post as it seems rushed. I would also like to see specific uses of pathos and logos. It is an extremely controversial topic though and it showcases the sinful world that we live in.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is a very sad article and it is tough how to feel about it. Though there are good arguments justifying why Turner should be let go in that time and all that, it still does not make what he did right. Rhetoric is extremely active when it comes to crimes as, like Brennan said, there are two very real sides. Overall this post was well written and very informational.

    Caleb

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Weight of Glory

In Mr. Cline's class a few weeks ago. We took the day off in a way from our normal classes. Instead of continuing to read the books we were assigned and discussing them, he read us the sermon by C.S Lewis "The Weight of Glory." Its a long sermon, but one worth reading. It is about the confusion many people have on the topic of what we desire the most. He explains after much background information, that we all desire true happiness. And through that happiness, we long for heaven, our true home that we were designed for. He explains that glory is not what many people think of as being "famous" in heaven. But more that we are honored by our Lord and Father. For it to be like the scripture passage "Well done, good and faithful servant." C.S Lewis does a fantastic job at being persuasive here, and if read by the right person aloud, can have an excellent effect. He clears up lots of points that people bring up that are not true. Such as the point of glory...

Stephen Curry (Brita)

I saw this commercial for Brita water on YouTube and on T.V.  Stephen Curry, a professional basketball player that plays for the Golden State Warriors, endorses and promotes the product by saying "not all water is the same."  In this advertisement he makes Brita water seem better than the other leading brands of water by saying "You are what you drink."  He also says "some water can dribble, drain threes, or even drain a buzzer beater."  With these claims, he is implying that drinking the Brita water it could make you better at basketball and help you become better and as good as him. Brita uses a celebrity to sell it by implying that it could improve your basketball performance.  This advertisement is false because water is not going to change your skills and abilities.  It tries to persuade you to buy it because a professional basketball player drinks it.  I feel as though it may persuade some people to buy it because of Stephen Curry endorsing it....

Marilyn Monroe's Shampoo

While browsing on Google I found an old advertisement.  The ad was for Lustre-Crème Shampoo. It featured Marilyn Monroe, known for her beauteous looks and her parts in different movies. One of her movies was Gentlemen Prefer Blondes. Lustre-Crème was attempting to sell their shampoo through the use of fallacies. By saying that Marilyn Monroe that tells you nothing about the actual product: it simply attracts you to the pretty face in the picture. Using this as an argument of why someone should buy your product is quite illogical. Just because Marilyn Monroe uses it doesn’t provide assurance of its abilities. They attempt using snob appeal by trying to make the audience believe that they could be like Marilyn Monroe if they use the same product as her. They use appeal to illegitimate authority by using Marilyn Monroe to promote their product. Although she herself is a customer, this is still rather irrelevant. She herself has no type of expertise in hair products and knows nothing t...